Abf-hannover.de ranking shows that the page is at position 11,522,996 over the world.
In terms of rank-to-traffic ratio, abf-hannover.de has 64 unique users per day, viewing 64 pages. The rank based value of abf-hannover.de is 0 USD. Every user makes 1.08 pageviews on average.
Abf-hannover.de boasts a link base consisting of 228 referring domains and 276 external backlinks, as revealed by the data obtained from web network scanning.
Abf-hannover.de top-level domain belongs to .DE domain zone. Check other webpages in .DE zone.
According the last verification test in April 30, 2021, abf-hannover.de has an expired wildcard SSL certificate issued by T-Systems International GmbH (expired on August 24, 2021). Click button “Update” SSL Information at the Safety Information section. Check the list of websites using SSL by T-Systems International GmbH.
Based on data from Google Safe Browsing, Google Safe Search and Symantec abf-hannover.de is a fairly safe domain.
According the Mobile-Friendly test by Google abf-hannover.de is nice optimized for mobile devices and tablets, however the webpage speed could be improved.
Domain | *.abf-hannover.de |
Issuer Organization | T-Systems International GmbH |
Issuer | TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA |
Algorithm | RSA-SHA256 |
Valid form | 08/19/2020 |
Expiration | 08/24/2021 |
Signed | Certificate is not self signed |
Additional Domains |
*.abf-hannover.de abf-hannover.de |
Alexa Rank shows how popular abf-hannover.de is in comparison with other sites. The most popular site has Alexa Rank equals 1. If abf-hannover.de has Alexa Rank equals 100,000, then it is in TOP 100,000 popular sites in the world. The rank is calculated using a combination of average daily visitors to abf-hannover.de and pageviews on abf-hannover.de over the past 3 months.
ASN ID: 3320
ASN Title: Deutsche Telekom AGLast Update: 03/17/2024
% This is the RIPE Database query service.
% The objects are in RPSL format.
%
% The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions.
% See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf
% Note: this output has been filtered.
% To receive output for a database update, use the "-B" flag.
% Information related to 'AS3209 - AS3353'
as-block: AS3209 - AS3353
descr: RIPE NCC ASN block
remarks: These AS Numbers are assigned to network operators in the RIPE NCC service region.
mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
created: 2010-05-11T11:44:28Z
last-modified: 2014-02-24T13:15:16Z
source: RIPE
% Information related to 'AS3320'
% Abuse contact for 'AS3320' is 'auftrag@nic.telekom.de'
aut-num: AS3320
as-name: DTAG
org: ORG-DTA2-RIPE
descr: Internet service provider operations
remarks: peering coordinators for AS3320:
remarks: abuse reports should be sent to the contacts
listed in the registry entries for the IP address of the
offending host system
remarks: We share the view that for many networks (including ours:-)
only some abstraction of the actual routing policy should/can
be published in the IRR.
Right now we are abstracting to a very essential minimum.
remarks: the most important and helpful use of the IRR is
to publish what a network will announce to peers and upstream
# we are providing that by means of the AS-set AS3320:AS-DTAG
# which we have been keeping up to date all the time
remarks: we encourage all our neighbors to define and maintain an
AS-set to describe their announcements, and to register
all the routes (and have their customers do so as well)
import: # heavy abstraction hits! well, we are ...
from AS-ANY # neither peering promiscuously
accept ANY # nor accepting all junk routes offered...
remarks: we maintain a list of what our neighbors have told us
about their announcements towards AS3320 - in terms of
AS-set (preferred), AS number, route-set
(and the IRR database used to publish)
remarks: in fact we apply route filters based on this
for all neighbors - as far as feasible
remarks: for data published through the RIPE routing registry
we generate filters automatically
remarks: we consider the integration of RIR and routing registry data
and the application of RPSS authorization a great feature
of the RIPE routing registry
# unfortunately this benefit is not available with any
# other IRR database that we know of...
# and some of the IRR databases allow essentially any garbage
# to be registered without any control - making those databases
# quite useless...
export: to AS3320:AS-CUSTOMERS # but don't publish that list;
announce ANY # in general - if they ask for less, we can do
export: to AS-ANY # for peers and others...
announce AS3320:AS-DTAG
# for backwards compatibility the older AS-DTAG
# will be kept around for some more time -
# defined using just members: AS3320:AS-DTAG
# please convert to AS3320:AS-DTAG if you are still
# using the old AS-DTAG
remarks: customers are strongly encouraged to define and maintain
an AS-set that we will include in the definition
of AS3320:AS-DTAG (if we are told the name)
remarks: this will be sufficient to have our peers accept the routes
remarks: in any case peers - and any network in the Internet -
is free to apply some selective policy (e.g. prefix
length based)
# but we do not think that any such selective policy
# will be based on details of our routing policy omitted
# from this aut-num: object
remarks: unfortunately some customers do not provide usable IRR data;
we will NOT add to the uncontrolled garbage in the IRR by
proxy registering in some database that requires no
authorization
remarks: we advise customers that routes without IRR registration
and not covered by AS3320:AS-DTAG may receive less than
full support by some of our peer networks and other
parts of the Internet
remarks: ==============================================================
IPv6 we do/publish essentially the same like for IPv4
mp-import: afi ipv6.unicast # heavy abstraction...
from AS-ANY # neither peering promiscuously
accept ANY # nor accepting all junk routes offered...
mp-export: afi ipv6.unicast
to AS3320:AS-CUSTOMERS-V6 # but don't publish that list;
announce ANY # in general - if they ask for less, we can do
mp-export: afi ipv6.unicast
to AS-ANY # for peers and others...
announce AS3320:AS-DTAG-V6
remarks: ==============================================================
admin-c: RV32
tech-c: RV32
status: ASSIGNED
mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-END-MNT
tech-c: BP32-RIPE
mnt-by: DTAG-RR
created: 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z
last-modified: 2017-11-15T09:13:45Z
source: RIPE
organisation: ORG-DTA2-RIPE
org-name: Deutsche Telekom AG
org-type: LIR
address: Eduard-Schopf-Allee 1
address: D-28217
address: Bremen
address: GERMANY
phone: +491607069891
fax-no: +494412344589
admin-c: DTAG-RIPE
admin-c: MR22061-RIPE
admin-c: UR661-RIPE
admin-c: SL7866-RIPE
admin-c: VZ56-RIPE
admin-c: SP8519-RIPE
admin-c: REIS1-RIPE
admin-c: HI56-RIPE
admin-c: PB4856-RIPE
admin-c: MBT1-RIPE
admin-c: BP32-RIPE
admin-c: LB470-RIPE
admin-c: ES4155-RIPE
admin-c: RV32
admin-c: PA3357-RIPE
admin-c: SB15220-RIPE
admin-c: KUNO2-RIPE
admin-c: HB3076-RIPE
admin-c: LF1459-RIPE
admin-c: KB6787-RIPE
abuse-c: DTAG3-RIPE
mnt-ref: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
mnt-ref: DTAG-NIC
mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
mnt-by: DTAG-NIC
created: 2004-04-17T11:12:44Z
last-modified: 2018-05-08T12:28:26Z
source: RIPE # Filtered
person: Berthold Paffrath
address: Deutsche Telekom AG, Internet Services
address: Postfach 2767
address: D-48014 Muenster
phone: +49 251 910 351
fax-no: +49 251 910 399
nic-hdl: BP32-RIPE
mnt-by: DTAG-RR
created: 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z
last-modified: 2001-09-21T23:34:28Z
source: RIPE # Filtered
person: Ruediger Volk
address: Deutsche Telekom AG, Zentrum IOT
address: Postfach 2767
address: D-48014 Muenster
phone: +49 251 910 351
fax-no: +49 251 910 399
nic-hdl: RV32
mnt-by: DTAG-RR
created: 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z
last-modified: 2001-09-21T23:34:30Z
source: RIPE # Filtered
% This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.91.2 (BLAARKOP)
Domain: abf-hannover.de
Status: connect
Host | A Record | TTL |
---|
Host | MX Record | Priority | TTL |
---|
Host | NS Record | TTL |
---|
Host | TXT Record | TTL |
---|
Last tested: 03/06/2019
Total Resources | 71 |
Number of Hosts | 12 |
Static Resources | 57 |
JavaScript Resources | 11 |
CSS Resources | 7 |
Last tested: 03/06/2019
Total Resources | 72 |
Number of Hosts | 13 |
Static Resources | 58 |
JavaScript Resources | 11 |
CSS Resources | 7 |